This May Be Out Of Topic But May Help Us In The Long Run
Hi guys. I believe I've found myself surrounded by great personalities here on this platform and I'm grateful I joined this social forum. We have really smart and interesting people here who stand to gain a lot from these financial markets. The mistake I'd hate for us to make is not investing in something less volatile than the forex markets. We are lucky enough to make money while a lot of our dear friends who do 9-5 are losing jobs left right and centre, and stand to lose their properties if another job doesn't come up. At first I wanted to have a lot of people to admire my social media with my possessions but I'm glad I was humbled by the market before I could make a fool out of myself. Maybe bringing dignity to this industry is what we need to do. With that being said, a lot of banks are repossessing assets across the world right now. Once your monthly profit is good, you'd get really great deals right now on cars and throw them on Uber services. Houses that are repossessed below market value currently are pretty attractive, revamping and renting out or toss them on Airbnb for a couple of years before reselling wouldn't be a bad idea especially since the market will have been restored. There's auctions all over the place and art, cars, houses, heavy duty caterpillar assets are so irresistible. Let's do this guys. Have an amazing, green and easy week full of pips and money. 💰
Форекс-кухня от FirstTrade - инвестируй в лохотрон и потеряй деньги
Форекс-кухня от FirstTrade - инвестируй в лохотрон и потеряй деньги - развод или правда. Честный отзыв от Baxov.Net Форекс-мошенники распространены повсеместно. Но больше всего их в интернете. Шарлатаны создают однотипные сайты, заманивают на них начинающих трейдеров и предлагают заключать сделки в фейковых терминалах. Таким мошенническим ресурсом является FirstTrade. На то, что это лохотрон, указывает множество моментов. Но давайте разбираться во всём по порядку. E-mail адреса проекта [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) Внимание! мошенники очень часто меняют адреса своих лохотронов. Поэтому название, адрес сайта или email может быть другим! Если Вы не нашли в списке нужный адрес, но лохотрон очень похож на описанный, пожалуйста свяжитесь с нами или напишите об этом в комментариях! Информация о проекте Что предлагают шарлатаны? Легенда такая: Более 150 торговых инструментов для торговли на Forex. Инвестируйте в лучшие площадки мира через популярные торговые платформы. В набор входит: 42 валютные пары; 36 акций США; 15 криптовалют; 13 мировых индексов; 6 видов металлов; 2 вида нефти. Если перечсистать, получается инструментов меньше 150. Но какая разница? В реальности все эти инструменты фейковые, так как доступа к настоящим биржам и небержевым торговым площадкам у мошенников нет. Торговых счетов на FirstTrade несколько. Они отличаются суммой минимального вклада и торговым набором. Условия такие: Standart: депозит от $500; программы лояльности; 330 CFD & Forex. Crypto: депозит от $1000; 68 криптопар; персональный аналитик. ECN Prime (условия толком не прописаны): быстрое пополнение; высокая ликвидность; узкие спреды. Micro: депозит от 500$; 66 торговых инструментов; кредитное плечо 1:500. Используют мошенники торговый терминал Ютип. Ранее на baxov.net был опубликован обзор на это программное обеспечение. Почитать можно по этой ссылке: https://www.baxov.net/reviews/nasha-ocenka-foreks-platforma-utip-stoit-li-registrirovatsya Вкратце, данный терминал был разработан российскими специалистами, высокого доверия к ПО у трейдеров нет. Пользователи жалуются на то, что в коде есть дыры, с помощью которых нечестные брокеры получают доступ к личному кабинету инвесторов и задним числом оформляют убыточные сделки, тем самым грабя клиентов. Регистрация на этом лохотроне простенькая. Аккаунт привязывается к электронной почте. В процессе мошенники просят также указать контактный телефон. Зачем? Чтобы они могли вам названивать и уговаривать потратить больше денег. Контакты проекта tel:+9 (876) 543 21 09 Skype: live:.cid.39f17b5872fa7b3a Адрес: The Financial Services Centre, Stoney Ground, Kingstown, St. Vincent and the Grenadines - это просто адрес здания, нет ни номера офиса, ни хотя бы номера абонентского ящика. Данные по сайту: домен firsttrade-corp.com был зарегистрирован 10 июня 2020 года на Украине Имя собственника скрыто Разоблачение проекта С первого взгляда понятно, что FirstTrade – это лохотрон. Во-первых, аферисты используют сомнительное программное обеспечение. Во-вторых, владельцы сайта не опубликовали документы, которые подтверждали бы легальность их работы. У шарлатанов нет не только лицензии национального финансового регулятора, но и банального свидетельства о регистрации. В-третьих, свои собственные документы жулики тоже забыли создать. Если вы зайдёте на сайт прохиндеев, вам сразу же предложат согласиться с cookie. Но если кликнуть по ссылке, попадёшь на страницу 404. Пользовательское соглашение, уведомление о рисках, политика возврата денежных средств, политика конфиденциальности, политика AML тоже отсутствуют. Вернее, эти документы упоминаются в подвале сайта, вот только текста договоров нет. Зато есть немного нелепо написанный отказ от ответственности. Процитирую: Инвестирование в группы высокого риска: (Forex) и контрактами на разницу (CFD) является спекулятивной операцией, включая высокий риск, и не подходит для каждого инвестора. Вы можете понести частичные, так и полные потери вложенных средств, поэтому мы не советуем инвестировать капитал, которым вы не можете рисковать. Вы должны знать о повышенном риске, связанном с использованием кредитного плеча. Мы настоятельно рекомендуем вам ознакомиться с условиями и услугами нашего веб-сайта, прежде чем начать пользоваться нашим сервисом. В-четвёртых, указан фейковый адрес в Сент-Жермене и Гренадинах (офшорном государстве). Как обманывают мошенники? Выше я уже писала, что жулики могут менять информацию в личном кабинете трейдера, заключая сделки, которые в реальности инвестор не заключал. Впрочем, шарлатаны могут вам нарисовать и прибыльную сделку. Зачем? Мерзавцы всё равно не позволят вам вывести деньги, придумав тысячу причин. Зато этот психологический трюк поможет им склонить доверчивых граждан вложить ещё больше, а значит потерять ещё больше. Возможные потери на проекте Итого: калькуляция возможных потерь на проекте – любая сумма, выше 500 долларов США. Вывод о проекте FirstTrade – стопроцентный лохотрон. У мошенников, создавших ресурс, нет документов, подтверждающих легальность их деятельности. Кроме того, реальные сделки они не проводят. Все торги в торговом терминале – это имитация. Защищайте себя и деньги вместе с Baxov.Net https://www.baxov.net/reviews/foreks-kukhnya-ot-firsttrade-investiruy-v-lokhotron-i-poteryay-dengi
This might be a bit of a rant, at this point I'm confused about all of this life stuff. I'm 24 years old and I know that can be quite young depending on perspective but I feel like I'm at the end. I've been an entrepreneur for about 6 years, I've also had multiple jobs in between. Does this cancel the whole entrepreneur thing? I've done regular retail work, customer service management, real estate sales, call centre and more so I'm pretty well experienced. I give everything I do 110%, its just in my nature and I take pride in separating myself from the crowd. I've done buying and selling of everything you can imagine (all legal) and I run an online clothing store. On top of that I've been in the stock market, forex etc. It might seem like I'm a jack of all trades but I try and put my efforts into 1 thing at a time. Have I still done too much? No matter what i try, I keep failing, am I looking for instant gratification too much? I've been running the clothing brand for about 3 years now and its only just getting to a point where I might make £50-£100 in profit per month, on a good month. I've just been scammed for £4,000 by some crooks, my bank has said they can't help me. I don't really want to live anymore. I lost £5,000 doing a favour for someone 2 years ago. What's the point of continuing if it seems like I'm only going to suffer. I'm a Christian and I actually paid tithes the same day I was scammed. I don't know, I'm tired of this.
No, the British did not steal $45 trillion from India
This is an updated copy of the version on BadHistory. I plan to update it in accordance with the feedback I got. I'd like to thank two people who will remain anonymous for helping me greatly with this post (you know who you are) Three years ago a festschrift for Binay Bhushan Chaudhuri was published by Shubhra Chakrabarti, a history teacher at the University of Delhi and Utsa Patnaik, a Marxist economist who taught at JNU until 2010. One of the essays in the festschirt by Utsa Patnaik was an attempt to quantify the "drain" undergone by India during British Rule. Her conclusion? Britain robbed India of $45 trillion (or £9.2 trillion) during their 200 or so years of rule. This figure was immensely popular, and got republished in several major news outlets (here, here, here, here (they get the number wrong) and more recently here), got a mention from the Minister of External Affairs & returns 29,100 results on Google. There's also plenty of references to it here on Reddit. Patnaik is not the first to calculate such a figure. Angus Maddison thought it was £100 million, Simon Digby said £1 billion, Javier Estaban said £40 million see Roy (2019). The huge range of figures should set off some alarm bells. So how did Patnaik calculate this (shockingly large) figure? Well, even though I don't have access to the festschrift, she conveniently has written an article detailing her methodology here. Let's have a look.
How exactly did the British manage to diddle us and drain our wealth’ ? was the question that Basudev Chatterjee (later editor of a volume in the Towards Freedom project) had posed to me 50 years ago when we were fellow-students abroad.
This is begging the question.
After decades of research I find that using India’s commodity export surplus as the measure and applying an interest rate of 5%, the total drain from 1765 to 1938, compounded up to 2016, comes to £9.2 trillion; since $4.86 exchanged for £1 those days, this sum equals about $45 trillion.
This is completely meaningless. To understand why it's meaningless consider India's annual coconut exports. These are almost certainly a surplus but the surplus in trade is countered by the other country buying the product (indeed, by definition, trade surpluses contribute to the GDP of a nation which hardly plays into intuitive conceptualisations of drain). Furthermore, Dewey (2019) critiques the 5% interest rate.
She [Patnaik] consistently adopts statistical assumptions (such as compound interest at a rate of 5% per annum over centuries) that exaggerate the magnitude of the drain
The exact mechanism of drain, or transfers from India to Britain was quite simple.
Drain theory possessed the political merit of being easily grasped by a nation of peasants. [...] No other idea could arouse people than the thought that they were being taxed so that others in far off lands might live in comfort. [...] It was, therefore, inevitable that the drain theory became the main staple of nationalist political agitation during the Gandhian era.
The key factor was Britain’s control over our taxation revenues combined with control over India’s financial gold and forex earnings from its booming commodity export surplus with the world. Simply put, Britain used locally raised rupee tax revenues to pay for its net import of goods, a highly abnormal use of budgetary funds not seen in any sovereign country.
The issue with figures like these is they all make certain methodological assumptions that are impossible to prove. From Roy in Frankema et al. (2019):
the "drain theory" of Indian poverty cannot be tested with evidence, for several reasons. First, it rests on the counterfactual that any money saved on account of factor payments abroad would translate into domestic investment, which can never be proved. Second, it rests on "the primitive notion that all payments to foreigners are "drain"", that is, on the assumption that these payments did not contribute to domestic national income to the equivalent extent (Kumar 1985, 384; see also Chaudhuri 1968). Again, this cannot be tested. [...] Fourth, while British officers serving India did receive salaries that were many times that of the average income in India, a paper using cross-country data shows that colonies with better paid officers were governed better (Jones 2013).
Indeed, drain theory rests on some very weak foundations. This, in of itself, should be enough to dismiss any of the other figures that get thrown out. Nonetheless, I felt it would be a useful exercise to continue exploring Patnaik's take on drain theory.
The East India Company from 1765 onwards allocated every year up to one-third of Indian budgetary revenues net of collection costs, to buy a large volume of goods for direct import into Britain, far in excess of that country’s own needs.
So what's going on here? Well Roy (2019) explains it better:
Colonial India ran an export surplus, which, together with foreign investment, was used to pay for services purchased from Britain. These payments included interest on public debt, salaries, and pensions paid to government offcers who had come from Britain, salaries of managers and engineers, guaranteed profts paid to railway companies, and repatriated business profts. How do we know that any of these payments involved paying too much? The answer is we do not.
So what was really happening is the government was paying its workers for services (as well as guaranteeing profits - to promote investment - something the GoI does today Dalal (2019), and promoting business in India), and those workers were remitting some of that money to Britain. This is hardly a drain (unless, of course, Indian diaspora around the world today are "draining" it). In some cases, the remittances would take the form of goods (as described) see Chaudhuri (1983):
It is obvious that these debit items were financed through the export surplus on merchandise account, and later, when railway construction started on a large scale in India, through capital import. Until 1833 the East India Company followed a cumbersome method in remitting the annual home charges. This was to purchase export commodities in India out of revenue, which were then shipped to London and the proceeds from their sale handed over to the home treasury.
While Roy's earlier point argues better paid officers governed better, it is honestly impossible to say what part of the repatriated export surplus was a drain, and what was not. However calling all of it a drain is definitely misguided. It's worth noting that Patnaik seems to make no attempt to quantify the benefits of the Raj either, Dewey (2019)'s 2nd criticism:
she [Patnaik] consistently ignores research that would tend to cut the economic impact of the drain down to size, such as the work on the sources of investment during the industrial revolution (which shows that industrialisation was financed by the ploughed-back profits of industrialists) or the costs of empire school (which stresses the high price of imperial defence)
Since tropical goods were highly prized in other cold temperate countries which could never produce them, in effect these free goods represented international purchasing power for Britain which kept a part for its own use and re-exported the balance to other countries in Europe and North America against import of food grains, iron and other goods in which it was deficient.
Re-exports necessarily adds value to goods when the goods are processed and when the goods are transported. The country with the largest navy at the time would presumably be in very good stead to do the latter.
The British historians Phyllis Deane and WA Cole presented an incorrect estimate of Britain’s 18th-19th century trade volume, by leaving out re-exports completely. I found that by 1800 Britain’s total trade was 62% higher than their estimate, on applying the correct definition of trade including re-exports, that is used by the United Nations and by all other international organisations.
While interesting, and certainly expected for such an old book, re-exporting necessarily adds value to goods.
When the Crown took over from the Company, from 1861 a clever system was developed under which all of India’s financial gold and forex earnings from its fast-rising commodity export surplus with the world, was intercepted and appropriated by Britain. As before up to a third of India’s rising budgetary revenues was not spent domestically but was set aside as ‘expenditure abroad’.
So, what does this mean? Britain appropriated all of India's earnings, and then spent a third of it aboard? Not exactly. She is describing home charges see Roy (2019) again:
Some of the expenditures on defense and administration were made in sterling and went out of the country. This payment by the government was known as the Home Charges. For example, interest payment on loans raised to finance construction of railways and irrigation works, pensions paid to retired officers, and purchase of stores, were payments in sterling. [...] almost all money that the government paid abroad corresponded to the purchase of a service from abroad. [...] The balance of payments system that emerged after 1800 was based on standard business principles.India bought something and paid for it.State revenues were used to pay for wages of people hired abroad, pay for interest on loans raised abroad, and repatriation of profits on foreign investments coming into India. These were legitimate market transactions.
Indeed, if paying for what you buy is drain, then several billions of us are drained every day.
The Secretary of State for India in Council, based in London, invited foreign importers to deposit with him the payment (in gold, sterling and their own currencies) for their net imports from India, and these gold and forex payments disappeared into the yawning maw of the SoS’s account in the Bank of England.
It should be noted that India having two heads was beneficial, and encouraged investment per Roy (2019):
The fact that the India Office in London managed a part of the monetary system made India creditworthy, stabilized its currency, and encouraged foreign savers to put money into railways and private enterprise in India. Current research on the history of public debt shows that stable and large colonies found it easier to borrow abroad than independent economies because the investors trusted the guarantee of the colonist powers.
Against India’s net foreign earnings he issued bills, termed Council bills (CBs), to an equivalent rupee value. The rate (between gold-linked sterling and silver rupee) at which the bills were issued, was carefully adjusted to the last farthing, so that foreigners would never find it more profitable to ship financial gold as payment directly to Indians, compared to using the CB route. Foreign importers then sent the CBs by post or by telegraph to the export houses in India, that via the exchange banks were paid out of the budgeted provision of sums under ‘expenditure abroad’, and the exporters in turn paid the producers (peasants and artisans) from whom they sourced the goods.
Sunderland (2013) argues CBs had two main roles (and neither were part of a grand plot to keep gold out of India):
Council bills had two roles. They firstly promoted trade by handing the IO some control of the rate of exchange and allowing the exchange banks to remit funds to India and to hedge currency transaction risks. They also enabled the Indian government to transfer cash to England for the payment of its UK commitments.
The United Nations (1962) historical data for 1900 to 1960, show that for three decades up to 1928 (and very likely earlier too) India posted the second highest merchandise export surplus in the world, with USA in the first position. Not only were Indians deprived of every bit of the enormous international purchasing power they had earned over 175 years, even its rupee equivalent was not issued to them since not even the colonial government was credited with any part of India’s net gold and forex earnings against which it could issue rupees. The sleight-of-hand employed, namely ‘paying’ producers out of their own taxes, made India’s export surplus unrequited and constituted a tax-financed drain to the metropolis, as had been correctly pointed out by those highly insightful classical writers, Dadabhai Naoroji and RCDutt.
It doesn't appear that others appreciate their insight Roy (2019):
K. N. Chaudhuri rightly calls such practice ‘confused’ economics ‘coloured by political feelings’.
Surplus budgets to effect such heavy tax-financed transfers had a severe employment–reducing and income-deflating effect: mass consumption was squeezed in order to release export goods. Per capita annual foodgrains absorption in British India declined from 210 kg. during the period 1904-09, to 157 kg. during 1937-41, and to only 137 kg by 1946.
If even a part of its enormous foreign earnings had been credited to it and not entirely siphoned off, India could have imported modern technology to build up an industrial structure as Japan was doing.
This is, unfortunately, impossible to prove. Had the British not arrived in India, there is no clear indication that India would've united (this is arguably more plausible than the given counterfactual1). Had the British not arrived in India, there is no clear indication India would not have been nuked in WW2, much like Japan. Had the British not arrived in India, there is no clear indication India would not have been invaded by lizard people, much like Japan. The list continues eternally. Nevertheless, I will charitably examine the given counterfactual anyway. Did pre-colonial India have industrial potential? The answer is a resounding no. From Gupta (1980):
This article starts from the premise that while economic categories - the extent of commodity production, wage labour, monetarisation of the economy, etc - should be the basis for any analysis of the production relations of pre-British India, it is the nature of class struggles arising out of particular class alignments that finally gives the decisive twist to social change. Arguing on this premise, and analysing the available evidence, this article concludes that there was little potential for industrial revolution before the British arrived in India because, whatever might have been the character of economic categories of that period,the class relations had not sufficiently matured to develop productive forces and the required class struggle for a 'revolution' to take place.
Yet all of this did not amount to an economic situation comparable to that of western Europe on the eve of the industrial revolution. Her technology - in agriculture as well as manufacturers - had by and large been stagnant for centuries. [...] The weakness of the Indian economy in the mid-eighteenth century, as compared to pre-industrial Europe was not simply a matter of technology and commercial and industrial organization. No scientific or geographical revolution formed part of the eighteenth-century Indian's historical experience. [...] Spontaneous movement towards industrialisation is unlikely in such a situation.
So now we've established India did not have industrial potential, was India similar to Japan just before the Meiji era? The answer, yet again, unsurprisingly, is no. Japan's economic situation was not comparable to India's, which allowed for Japan to finance its revolution. From Yasuba (1986):
All in all, the Japanese standard of living may not have been much below the English standard of living before industrialization, and both of them may have been considerably higher than the Indian standard of living. We can no longer say that Japan started from a pathetically low economic level and achieved a rapid or even "miraculous" economic growth. Japan's per capita income was almost as high as in Western Europe before industrialization, and it was possible for Japan to produce surplus in the Meiji Period to finance private and public capital formation.
The circumstances that led to Meiji Japan were extremely unique. See Tomlinson (1985):
Most modern comparisons between India and Japan, written by either Indianists or Japanese specialists, stress instead that industrial growth in Meiji Japan was the product of unique features that were not reproducible elsewhere. [...] it is undoubtably true that Japan's progress to industrialization has been unique and unrepeatable
So there you have it. Unsubstantiated statistical assumptions, calling any number you can a drain & assuming a counterfactual for no good reason gets you this $45 trillion number. Hopefully that's enough to bury it in the ground. 1. Several authors have affirmed that Indian identity is a colonial artefact. For example seeRajan 1969:
Perhaps the single greatest and most enduring impact of British rule over India is that it created an Indian nation, in the modern political sense. After centuries of rule by different dynasties overparts of the Indian sub-continent, and after about 100 years of British rule, Indians ceased to be merely Bengalis, Maharashtrians,or Tamils, linguistically and culturally.
But then, it would be anachronistic to condemn eighteenth-century Indians, who served the British, as collaborators, when the notion of 'democratic' nationalism or of an Indian 'nation' did not then exist.[...]Indians who fought for them, differed from the Europeans in having a primary attachment to a non-belligerent religion, family and local chief, which was stronger than any identity they might have with a more remote prince or 'nation'.
Chakrabarti, Shubra & Patnaik, Utsa (2018). Agrarian and other histories: Essays for Binay Bhushan Chaudhuri. Colombia University Press Hickel, Jason (2018). How the British stole $45 trillion from India. The Guardian Bhuyan, Aroonim & Sharma, Krishan (2019). The Great Loot: How the British stole $45 trillion from India. Indiapost Monbiot, George (2020). English Landowners have stolen our rights. It is time to reclaim them. The Guardian Tsjeng, Zing (2020). How Britain Stole $45 trillion from India with trains | Empires of Dirt. Vice Chaudhury, Dipanjan (2019). British looted $45 trillion from India in today’s value: Jaishankar. The Economic Times Roy, Tirthankar (2019). How British rule changed India's economy: The Paradox of the Raj. Palgrave Macmillan Patnaik, Utsa (2018). How the British impoverished India. Hindustan Times Tuovila, Alicia (2019). Expenditure method. Investopedia Dewey, Clive (2019). Changing the guard: The dissolution of the nationalist–Marxist orthodoxy in the agrarian and agricultural history of India. The Indian Economic & Social History Review Chandra, Bipan et al. (1989). India's Struggle for Independence, 1857-1947. Penguin Books Frankema, Ewout & Booth, Anne (2019). Fiscal Capacity and the Colonial State in Asia and Africa, c. 1850-1960. Cambridge University Press Dalal, Sucheta (2019). IL&FS Controversy: Centre is Paying Up on Sovereign Guarantees to ADB, KfW for Group's Loan. TheWire Chaudhuri, K.N. (1983). X - Foreign Trade and Balance of Payments (1757–1947). Cambridge University Press Sunderland, David (2013). Financing the Raj: The City of London and Colonial India, 1858-1940. Boydell Press Dewey, Clive (1978). Patwari and Chaukidar: Subordinate officials and the reliability of India’s agricultural statistics. Athlone Press Smith, Lisa (2015). The great Indian calorie debate: Explaining rising undernourishment during India’s rapid economic growth. Food Policy Duh, Josephine & Spears, Dean (2016). Health and Hunger: Disease, Energy Needs, and the Indian Calorie Consumption Puzzle. The Economic Journal Vankatesh, P. et al. (2016). Relationship between Food Production and Consumption Diversity in India – Empirical Evidences from Cross Section Analysis. Agricultural Economics Research Review Gupta, Shaibal (1980). Potential of Industrial Revolution in Pre-British India. Economic and Political Weekly Raychaudhuri, Tapan (1983). I - The mid-eighteenth-century background. Cambridge University Press Yasuba, Yasukichi (1986). Standard of Living in Japan Before Industrialization: From what Level did Japan Begin? A Comment. The Journal of Economic History Tomblinson, B.R. (1985). Writing History Sideways: Lessons for Indian Economic Historians from Meiji Japan. Cambridge University Press Rajan, M.S. (1969). The Impact of British Rule in India. Journal of Contemporary History Bryant, G.J. (2000). Indigenous Mercenaries in the Service of European Imperialists: The Case of the Sepoys in the Early British Indian Army, 1750-1800. War in History
How our trader’s room enhance broker’s productivity
What is the trader's room? Trader’s room is an interface between where clients can have their individual login area and through that they can have access to all the amazing features of the trader's room. Reasons why trader’s room enhances the productivity of the broker:
Now with Launch FXM’s trader’s room, it has become very easy to integrate easily with various trading platforms. With an online application form, clients can easily sign up and onboard easily by choosing the trading platform to trade on like MT4 or MT5. Multiple trading accounts can be handled.
With the help of Launch FXM’s traders room get the insights of all the valuable data as the data is all centred right under the single roof, which helps in giving the overall view of the business. Get the entire data report for all the different divisions of the business.This feature will help in letting the company know which area and division to focus on more.
Launch FXM’s trader’s room has made all the transactions very smooth and safe. Users can transfer funds seamlessly from wallet to trading account and vice versa. All your transactions can easily be managed as the bulk deposits are taken proper care of and handled automatically due to which all the transactions are very well safeguarded. The automation process for deposit and withdrawals saves a lot of time.
Multi Level IB Support:
IB support is the most crucial and demanding component of the trader’s room and through the trader's room, IB can access their introduced clients as well as the commissions. In the forex industry it has become very important to have IB in order to make your business more productive and with a trader's room IB gets access to referral links, marketing materials and banners and apart from this IBs can also have access to open trading accounts.
November 2030 Well, uh, this sucks. Just a few short months after the Arab States of the Gulf finally unified, the world economy decided to explode. This is what we in the business of economics call a very bad thing. The effects across the FAS have been relatively disparate. The United Arab Emirates, easily the most diversified economy in the region, has been the least heavily impacted (though it's still bad). Diversification programs in Oman and Bahrain have also helped to stave off some of the worst impacts of the crisis, though they haven't been as successful in avoiding the effects as the UAE. Qatar and Kuwait, still almost entirely reliant on hydrocarbon exports, are not happy with this turn of events. Falling global oil prices, though propped up a little by a sudden increase in demand from China, have left their economies struggling much more than the rest of the country, and in desperate need of assistance from the better off parts of the country. One major pain point in this crisis has been the FAS's economic ties to the United States. While most of the FAS's trade is with Asia, Africa, and Europe, the US financial system still plays a crucial role in the FAS. The stability of the US Dollar has long been used to protect the economies of the Gulf using their vast Forex reserves (earned from oil sales) to peg their currency to the US Dollar. With the US Dollar in complete collapse, the value of the Khaleeji is plummeting right along with it, causing a significant degree of harm to the FAS's economy. To help offset this harm (and to decouple the FAS's economy from a country that the FAS is starting to view as maybe not the most reliable economic partner), the Central Bank in Dubai has announced that the Khaleeji will switch its peg from the US Dollar to a basket of foreign currencies (the Euro, the Pound Sterling, the Swiss Franc, the US Dollar, and the Japanese Yen). The FAS hopes that this will help to salvage the Khaleeji's value, better protecting the economy from the collapse of the dollar-based international financial system. Rumor has it that the Central Bank is discussing the idea of unpegging the Khaleeji entirely and allowing it to float freely, but so far, the Central Bank has made no moves towards floating the Khaleeji. Crises suck. They shatter the status quo and throw established norms and procedures into chaos. No one really wins during a crisis. But in another sense, they're a double-edged sword. The status quo is often a repressive entity, reinforcing existing hierarchies and preventing dramatic shifts in the order of things. Chaos breaks that apart, giving the ingenuitive and the entrepreneurial on opportunity to better their lot in ways they otherwise could not. Put differently: chaos is a ladder, and the FAS intends to be the one climbing it. As the largest economy in the Arab World (and one of the world's 20 largest economies) by both nominal GDP and GDP per capita (by a significant margin--it's probably either Saudi Arabia or Egypt in second place in nominal GDP, and definitely Saudi Arabia in second place in GDP per capita, but the FAS more than doubles the country in second place in both categories, so it's sort of a moot point), the FAS hopes to cement its place as the regional economic power. The FAS has announced a new slate of policies intended to attract rich investors, manufacturing firms, and financiers fleeing the new nationalization program of the United States. New free trade zones have been created throughout the country--especially in the struggling, undiversified regions of Kuwait and Qatar--with the goal of convincing fleeing American manufacturers to set up shop in these areas. Attractions include wildly low tax rates (as low as zero percent in some instances), a common law framework (as opposed to the Sharia-based legal system in most of the FAS), highly subsidized land prices (sometimes free), relaxed financial restrictions (making it easier to move money in and out of the FTZ), and, for large enough firms moving enough operations into the country, preferential visa treatment (making it easier for them to relocate foreign employees into the country). Sitting at one of the major crossroads of global trade, moving operations to the FAS offers easy access to both the world's established consumer markets (like the EU and East Asia) as well as to some of its largest growing markets (South and Southeast Asia, East Africa, and MENA). Pair this with wildly high standards of living (for people who aren't slaves Asian or African migrant workers) and established expatriate communities, and the FAS becomes an incredibly attractive option for American and other foreign firms looking to relocate. In addition to manufacturing-oriented FTZs, special attention has been paid to attracting service-oriented firms to new and existing FTZs in the vein of Dubai Internet City, Dubai Design District, Dubai Knowledge Park, and Dubai Media City, with the goal of developing a robust service economy that can capture growing markets in the MENA, South Asia, and East African regions. In advertising these zones, the governments of the FAS have highlighted the success of previous ventures in Dubai, which have attracted the regional headquarters of giants like Facebook, Intel, LinkedIn, Google, Dell, Samsung, Microsoft, IBM, Tata Consultancy, and more. Perhaps one of the most substantial pushes, though, is to attract American financial services and FinTech firms to base in the FAS (particularly Dubai, Kuwait City, Doha, and Abu Dhabi, the traditional centers of regional finance). New financial industry free trade zones have been set up in the four cities, structured in the vein of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC). These financial FTZs boast an independent and internationally regulated regulatory and judicial system, a common law framework, and extremely low taxation rates. All government services in these regions are available in English (the lingua franca of international finance), and in events where ambiguity exists in the legal and regulatory systems, the systems are set to default to English Common Law (except for the Kuwait City International Financial Centre, which is hoping to better tailor itself towards American financial firms by defaulting to American Civil Law from pre-2020 rather than English Common Law). Much like in the DIFC, these new FTZs will also run their own courts, staffed in large part by top judicial talent from Common Law (or in the case of Kuwait City, American Civil Law) jurisdictions like Singapore, England, and (formerly) Hong Kong. Using these FTZ, the four cities hope to raise their profile as financial centers. Dubai in particular is hoping to break into the top ten global financial centers--and it stands a good chance of doing so, too, as it sits at number 12, just behind cities like LA, SF, and Shenzhen--while the other cities are just hoping to boost their profile into the 20s or 10s (according to Long Finance, Dubai is number 12 in the world and 1 in the region, Abu Dhabi is number 39 in the world and two in the region, Doha is number 48 in the world, and Kuwait City is number 91).
Финансовая кухня от псевдо-брокера BDP Finance или как гарантированно понести убытки
Финансовая кухня от псевдо-брокера BDP Finance или как гарантированно понести убытки - развод или правда. Честный отзыв от Baxov.Net Брокерская компания BDP Finance – это шайка мошенников, обманывающая трейдеров. Аферисты создали онлайн-платформу для торгов на бирже и приглашают всех желающих инвестировать в их проект деньги. Делать этого ни в коем случае нельзя, ибо любой ваш вклад обернётся убытками. Почему? Давайте разбираться. E-mail адреса проекта [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) Внимание! мошенники очень часто меняют адреса своих лохотронов. Поэтому название, адрес сайта или email может быть другим! Если Вы не нашли в списке нужный адрес, но лохотрон очень похож на описанный, пожалуйста свяжитесь с нами или напишите об этом в комментариях! Информация о проекте Давайте начнём с легенды этого лохотрона. О себе мошенники пишут: BDP FINANCE – ОДНА ИЗ ВЕДУЩИХ АЗИАТСКИХ БРОКЕРСКИХ КОМПАНИЙ BDP Finance предлагает лучшие торговые условия и профессиональный торговый терминал для опытных трейдеров. Клиентам, не имеющим существенного опыта торговли на финансовых рынках, мы рекомендуем вести торговлю с персональными аналитиками компании BDP Finance. Азиатская? Забавно. Конечно, если заглянуть на сайт прохиндеев, можно увидеть мультиинтерфейс. Среди представленных языков есть и азиатские. Но в личном кабинете на выбор предлагается только английский и русский. О чём это говорит? О том, что жулики в основном ориентируются на русскоязычных пользователей. Но давайте читать легенду дальше: Рождение бренда и первые успехи В 2014 году команда профессиональных трейдеров и IT-специалистов из Китая создали бренд BDP Finance. До конца года брокер смог привлечь десятки тысяч новых пользователей, которые оценили преимущества брокера над конкурентами. Да, домен старый. Но, по данным ВебАрхива, ещё год назад на этом домене находился сайт, принадлежащий компании, разрабатывающей программное обеспечение для банков и финансовых организаций. То есть бренду BDP Finance в реальности нет и года. По всему видно, что легенда лживая, поэтому не буду утомлять вас продолжением. Чем же якобы предлагают торговать шарлатаны? Контрактами на разницу (CFD). Набор финансовых инструментов стандартный: акции, сырьё, индексы, валютные пары, криптовалюта. Типов счетов три. Условия такие: Mini: Минимальный депозит: $100 Кредитное плечо: 1:20 Финансовые инструменты: Forex, Metals, Сommodities, Crypto Скорость исполнения: 0.1-0.5 сек Standard: Минимальный депозит: $1 000 Кредитное плечо: 1:100 Финансовые инструменты: Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Stocks, Crypto Скорость исполнения: 0.01-0.05 сек PRO: Минимальный депозит: $10 000 Кредитное плечо: 1:200 Финансовые инструменты: Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Stocks, Crypto Скорость исполнения: 0.01-0.05 сек Защита депозитов Круглосуточная персональная поддержка Как видите, аппетиты у мошенников немаленькие. Аферисты уверяют, что работают легально. С их слов их компания зарегистрирована в Сент-Винсент и Гренадинах. Кто не знает, это такое офшорное государство в Карибском море. Далековато от Азии. Проверить документы компании в офшоре затруднительно. Нужен официальный запрос от компетентных органов. Поэтому доверять брокерам, зарегистрированным там, не стоит. Впрочем, я думаю, что наши шарлатаны вообще не имеют никакой регистрации. Дело в том, что они не соизволили опубликовать свидетельство о регистрации и лицензию финансового регулятора. Кроме того, мошенники оформили свои реквизиты в подвале сайте не в виде текста, а в виде картинки. Чтобы нам с коллегами было сложнее скопировать данные и проверить по юридическим реестрам. Мне не сложно перепечатать вручную: Innovative Market Investments LLC, регистрация №345 LLC Поиск компании результатов не дал. Видимо, она сверхсекретная. Теперь давайте посмотрим на пользовательское соглашение. Хотя я бы его так не называла. Документу больше подходит определение – филькина грамота. Что написано в начале? Настоящее пользовательское соглашение (далее, «соглашение»), включая условия предоставления трейдерских услуг, подготовлено компанией Bdpfinance Limited. И что это за компания такая - Bdpfinance Limited? Номера регистрации нет, других реквизитов тоже нет. Innovative Market Investments LLC там вообще не упоминается. А что упоминается? Отказ от ответственности. Например: 2.9. Мы не предоставляем никаких явных или подразумеваемых гарантий в отношении: … 2.9.2. работы, качества, функциональных возможностей торговой платформы… То есть жулики предупреждают, что верить данным в торговом терминале нельзя. Кроме того, если вы подхватите вирус, используя программное обеспечение BDP Finance, это ваши проблемы. При этом аферисты уточняют: 27.2. Компания не несёт ответственность: 27.2.1. за любые убытки, расходы, затраты или финансовые обязательства (в совокупности именуемые «убытки»), понесённые пользователем, за исключением случаев, когда пользователь понёс такие убытки в результате небрежности или умышленного невыполнения обязательств со стороны Компании, и в той мере, в какой эти убытки вызваны указанными выше причинами… Это всё, конечно, хорошо. Но как доказать, что Компания умышленно не выполняла обязательства, если она не гарантирует работоспособность и надёжность платформы? То есть по сути жулики вообще ни за что не несут ответственность. Вы всё ещё хотите зарегистрироваться на этом лохотроне и вложить денег? Контакты проекта Адрес регистрации «компании»: Suite 305, Griffith Corporate Centre, Beachmont, Кингстаун, Сент-Винсент и Гренадины, VC0100 P.O. BOX 1510 – этот адрес фигурирует во многих подобных лохотронах. Адреса «офисов»: 12/F, Wing On Plaza, 62 Mody Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Hong Kong, Hong Kong Gwan-Og Bldg, 563 Itaewon-dong, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, The Republic of Korea Beaumont Business Centres, 6 Snow Hill, Farringdon, London EC1A 2AY, United Kingdom Все адреса – липа. Данные по сайту: домен BdpFinance.com был зарегистрирован 29 марта 2014 года имя собственника скрыто Разоблачение проекта То, что BDP Finance – лохотрон, нет сомнений. Во-первых, у шарлатанов нет документов, подтверждающих легальность их работы. Упоминание какой-то мутной шараги, якобы зарегистрированной в Карибском бассейне, не в счёт. В пользовательском соглашении Innovative Market Investments LLC не упоминается. Связь этой офшорной компании с Bdpfinance Limited не прослеживается. Кроме того, если бы данные аферисты работали легально, у них были бы документы о регистрации в Гонконге, Корее и Британии. И в России, раз уж этот типа брокер работает на территории РФ, Во-вторых, пользовательское соглашение, которое точнее было бы назвать филькиной грамотой, наполнено противоречиями и отказом от ответственности. Писал текст соглашения не юрист, а копирайтер-недоучка. Работать с компанией, которая не желает предоставлять качественные услуги, опасно. В-третьих, у прохиндеев лживая легенда. Аферисты пишут, что работают с 2014 года, но в реальности лохотрону нет и года. В чём же суть афёры? Всё просто. Мошенники банально заманивают начинающих трейдеров в финансовую кухню. На жаргоне так называют ситуацию, когда заявки закрываются за счёт встречных заявок других трейдеров того же брокера или самим брокером. Это ведёт к конфликту интересов. Ибо брокер не может работать в убыток. Кроме того, жулики используют сомнительный торговый терминал, и могут рисовать любые графики и котировки. Реальных торгов мерзавцы не ведут. Вся их деятельность – имитация. Безусловно, первое время шарлатаны будут изображать бурную деятельность и даже нарисуют какую-то прибыль в личном кабинете клиента. Вывести «заработанное» не получится. Мошенники найдут миллион причин, чтобы не переводить деньги. «Прибыль» нужна только для того, чтобы трейдер вложился ещё. Жулики будут доить бедолагу до тех пор, пока не загонят в долги. Поэтому поддаваться искушению и вкладывать в этот лохотрон не стоит. Что делать, если вы уже пострадали от действий аферистов? Пытаться оформить возврат платежа, если вы платили банковской картой. И обратиться в полицию. Возможные потери на проекте Итого: калькуляция возможных потерь на проекте – любая сумма, выше 100 долларов. Вывод о проекте BDP Finance – лохотрон. Документов у них нет, легенда лживая, торговый терминал сомнительный. Не связывайтесь с этими мошенниками. Любой ваш вклад обернётся убытком. Уберегайте себя и активы вместе с Baxov.Net https://www.baxov.net/reviews/finansovaya-kukhnya-ot-psevdo-brokera-bdp-finance-ili-kak-garantirovanno-ponesti-ubytki
The apex in now in sight. Final preparations for the crash.
I think the market will top in the next five trading days (Final week of May), and in the next 10 trading days volatility will again take centre stage. The last time I took a pop at a big bold calling of the exact high price and exact day was February 12th, 2020. The market went up a tiny bit more from there. There was a weak uptrend that lasted about a week, and then the market came down. I think we’re now at the same point we were on the 12th of February. In the final days before chaos is unleashed. At this point I think the high in the market will be made sometime between Friday the 29th of May, 2020 and Tuesday the second of June, 2020. I think the high price on the SPX will be at, or very close to, 3080. I think the drop that follows this will be a bit over 1,920 points. This gives a target price of 1160 (And I’ll take 1225 to front run this). Over the week ahead I’m going to make a superhuman effort to provide all the things I think are needed to benefit during this. This will include my analysis, generic strategies and my jackpot trades paying over 1:100. Early in the week that follows I’ll talk through positions I am taking expecting the high. From the start of the week after that, I think the market falls. I think the market will take about a week to get to 2500 area. From there we’ll see a small bullish week back to around 2700. After this the strong market crash will begin. This would imply there being bad news around the 6 - 8th of June and this followed by worse news around the 21st to 23rd of June. Capitulation will start around the 24th - 25th of June. During this there will be some bull days, and we should sell into these bull days. Once the market starts to fall the time I can allocate to providing free information is going to drop to very close to zero. There’ll be some stuff I copy and paste talking about what I am doing. There may be some end of days (Or weekends) where I can do detailed write ups. I’ll be able to maintain fairly good tracking of swing positions, but not intra-day/week. When the market starts to move 99.9% of my attention will have to be entirely focused on the management of my own trades and ensuring people who I have as clients are well prepared and fully updated as things develop. Once the market is falling I’ll be accepting no new clients. I won’t be able to be contacted until I think the low has been made. Please understand this is not rudeness, but when the market is moving - that’s when I do my job. I can talk about things before them and after them, not during them. Itinerary of content I aim to cover in the week ahead. (I’ll link these in this post as they’re completed. So bookmark this) Analysis;
A brief overview of the analysis methods I am using. What I’ll be looking for to confirm trade plans and what I’d be looking for to tell me I am wrong and to stop losses.
Areas of engagement and action plan for following market breaks.
Action to look for to spot a possible bottom coming.
Call spreads: How and why.
Naked put options: How and why.
Placing limit orders to enter into bear markets: How and why.
Put spreads: How and why.
Selling covered calls. How and why.
Jackpot trades; Individual swing trades paying between $70,000 - $150,000 for each $500 - $1,000 risked. Psychology; How to keep your mind while everyone around you loses theirs. Things I’ll setup to track trading plans Free Stuff: Discord view only server covering swing trading plans. This will include;
Monthly put options
Monthly call spreads
Monthly put spreads
Futures swing trades
Forex swing trades
Paid Stuff: During the fall I’m only going to be able to continue to provide weekly and daily trade plans if people pay for it. The reason for this is, for it to be viable for me, I’m going to have to hire people to do the leg work in managing this. I won’t have time to do it all myself. I’m charging you to cover the costs I’ll incur to give it to you. I’ll setup a discord server with;
Trading chat. Live updates. Limited QA.
Daily and weekly analysis/trade plans (Multiple markets)
Daily and weekly call/put spreads (For income)
Complex ‘Set&Forget’ pending order trade plans (Futures, commodities and Forex).
To join the paid discord server will cost you only $50, but it is only open to join until the market starts to fall. I’ll accept new people during the next 3 weeks. Once the market starts to fall, I’ll edit this post to remove this section, and will not accept anyone new. If the market does not fall within 8 weeks from today - my plan is not working. I’ll refund all payments/close the server. There are some people here to call me a scammer. I’d suggest you do not send me the $50 if you’ve not already gotten at least $50 of value out of what I’ve shared. I’m going to keep on doing the same thing. Personally, I think i should be charging over 100* what I am, but I suppose value is very subjective. I’ll accept payments for this only via Paypal (Much easier if I end up refunding). To join this; 1 - Send $50 to PayPal email: [Redacted. People are more hassle than it's worth to help] 2 - Send payment transaction number via email to the same email address. Links to join will be sent to you. Please allow for some time, but should usually be within a few hours. I’m going to do my best to try to get through as many of my messages here as possible over the weekend (Currently seems to be about 50 pending, so no promises). By end of next week I’ll probably not be reading/replying to any messages, and by the week after I’ll probably also not be reading replies to threads/username mentions etc. I want to make sure everyone fully understands that and is prepared for it. During the week ahead I’ll bombard you with everything I think you need to understand what is happening, and while it is happening I’ll be non-contactable publicly. This will remain the case until I think we’re in at the low - and then I’ll again have time to be chatty. Relevant links will be added to this post to refer to different things (Plans, strategies and so on). So bookmark this thread and then you can use it as a master thread to find everything (I think) will be important. I think we have just 10 more trading days until this starts. 10 days where the market is fairly dull and boring, and then months and months of work starts to all come together over a matter of minutes. I’d suggest at this time it would be especially prudent to take actions to protect yourself from any lasting exposure to this. Real world and digital. Put foam on the runway.
This might be a bit of a rant, at this point I'm confused about all of this life stuff. I'm 24 years old and I know that can be quite young depending on perspective but I feel like I'm at the end. I've been an entrepreneur for about 6 years, I've also had multiple jobs in between. Does this cancel the whole entrepreneur thing? It's really the title that matters to me in the end. I've done regular retail work, customer service management, real estate sales, call centre and more so I'm pretty well experienced. I give everything I do 110%, its just in my nature and I take pride in separating myself from the crowd. Since I've basically done every job that exists, I want credit now for my extensive knowledge of everything. I've done buying and selling of everything you can imagine (all legal) and I run an online clothing store. On top of that I've been in the stock market, forex etc. It might seem like I'm a jack of all trades but I try and put my efforts into 1 thing at a time. Have I still done too much? Or have I done too little; maybe I should try the illegal stuff now too? No matter what I try, I keep winning but I'm not mega-yacht rich yet, so I dunno; am I looking for instant gratification too much? I've been running the clothing brand for about 3 years now and its only just getting to a point where I might make $50,000-$100,000 in profit per month, on a good month. A recent experience where I got scammed opened my eyes to the possibility that scamming people might be lucrative, too. What's the point of continuing if it's just so easy to find and create all these opportunities to try out at such a young age? I'm getting bored and not one of the opportunities has gifted me my yacht, so pretty much feeling like I should give up. I'm a Christian and I actually paid tithes the same day I came up with the scamming idea, so maybe that really is the best route. I don't know, I'm tired of this. Why don't I get to FatFire yet??
Again within 24 hours of trying to work out a way to make this sustainable and workable for everyone I've noticed it's not worth the hassle to do so. It seems a lot of you expect everything for nothing. I'm afraid that is not going to work for me. Nothing I am doing is free for me, and if people do not want to pitch in the tiniest bit to help with that I can only conclude one of two things; 1 - The info is not worth $50 to you. In which case it is not worth my time writing it. 2 - People are ungrateful. In which case it is not worth my time writing it. If people were willing to meet me half way, I'd have went a lot further. People seem to want to stand where they are and shout over to me I'm a scammer for not bringing it all to their feet. That's a perspective. You can have it. I do not mind. But if this is your talk, I'll trade in silence. I'll also show you what happens with the "Scammy" info I was going to provide you for $50. In the week ahead I'll set up an account with a similar amount to the amount of money people seem to think it's egregious to ask for, and I'll run the same trades on this as will be in the trading plans shared in the proposed offer. I'll use recognised results tracking programs that will automatically verify and display the results. Build up phase: I'll start with currency trades. These are the lowest barrier to entry since I can trade micro lots and also have access to leverage. Currency trades should give me about 400 'pips' margin of error. Realistically, I should not need more than 40. I think SPX will be up 2 - 4% next week, this should give gains to on the Aussie against the Swiss (AUDCHF) - I'll go long AUDCHF. Margin up phase: After the currency trades I should have enough to trade SPX. I'll start to position short on SPX around 3080 and I'll take a first target of 2377. Given the right setups I'll add to my SPX short as prices are falling to bulk up the net take profit on the trade if it works. I'll trail my stops on the first trades to mke sure I'm not increasing my risk . Big up phase: By this time I should have enough margin to trade the Dow. Here I can make some real money. Around 21,000 I'll start to short the Dow and I'll be targeting 10,000. This trade should pay me somewhere in the region of $50,000 per traded lot. During the move I should be able to build up a position of at least 4 - 5 lots on the margin I have. Should be over $200,000 if it hits. Cash flow up phase: Once the drop has happened, I will begin to go long and do it in ways that will generate me daily income. I'll do this by transferring about $100K into options account and selling puts for 100 SPY. I'll also switch back to currency trades and I'll engage in what are known as "Carry trades", these will pay me every day I hold the trade based upon the "Swap". The best carry trades will depend upon what respective interest rates are at the time. Assuming things are similar (relatively) to how they currently are, I will be buying the Aussie, Kiwi and Turkish currencies and I'll be selling them against the dollar and Yen. This will be long AUDUSD, NZDUSD, AUDJPY, NZDJPY and short USDTRY. I'll allocate $50,000 to carry trades. I'll use the remaining money to hedge and offset risks/losses on my cash flow trades if that is needed, and if not I will use it to make similar trades but ones based upon a short time frame and geared towards risk:reward based profit rather than passive cash flow. I'll keep doing this until the Dow is back to around 17,000 - 18,000. Crash cash phase: For the next phase of the drop I will again switch to trading the Dow. This is where I can make most money. I might also allocate $100 - 200K to OTM puts, but since this can be a slower more steady crash it will make more sense to build a position in the CFD market on the Dow. Again my Dow trade should pay over $50,000 per lot. This time building up over 20 lots should be fairly easy. Cash flow decade phase: Once the market has crashed I will start to become a big options seller. i'll also engage in carry trades if interest rates are not all screwed up (Which is there are 'currency wars' they could be). Being able to be on the right side of a carry trade will determine if this is viable or not - and that has some variables that can not be known at this time. I'd love to be able to just short USDTRY, though. If it's viable. With options, I will be selling both put options and call options. I think once the crash has happened we will enter into a long term theta market last 10 - 15 years - this period is known as a 'Lost decade)'. I'll sell SPY puts for under the lows and I'll also sell SPY calls each time there is jumps in upside volatility. I'll be happy to sell SPY calls for 200 for literally years on end. By this time I should have more than $50. I'll update my swing plans either bi-weekly, weekly or monthly. Pending on how much free time I have. I'll edit this post to add in the results tracking material when I set it up. Update: Here's the tracking link. http://www.myfxbook.com/members/2020sBeasomething-for-nothing/6040046 I set the copy software to invert trades & the first trades went short AUDCHF rather than long. That puts me on quite a substantial losing start, but it should not matter. Might push the start of SPX trades back a week. Probably won't. Let me just show the value of what I've been trying to teach you.
Hey guys! Most of my Forex experience I've been battling with my own head. I come from a very mathematical background and having applied my understanding of statistics, somewhat quickly arrived at strategies that could make money. The only aspect that I constantly struggled with was my psychology. Having overcome some of those problems already, I figured I'll share my personal way I learned how to keep myself in check and make sure I don't become irrational. Here's some of the realisations listed.
Don't ever measure your success with money. So many people, myself included are celebrating their big trades, chasing the profits, just developing an unhealthy mindset centred around the money. It really is not the key.
I learned how to view money as a side effect of successful trading. Implementing decision based approach (instead of outcome based one), helps a lot! You can make a lot of money in a bad trade and lose a lot in a good one. Always question yourself and your strategy, when it's profitable or when it's not.
After a successful trade - 'If only I had a bigger lot size on this one/if only I traded it in my live account'. Very common one, can reveal a lot of weakness. If you experience thoughts like this, or even worse if you see those kind of thoughts influence your decision - take a step back and work on your psychology. Any kind of expression like this shows greed. It's you chasing that money again, and usually this chase means you will lose it all along the way...
If you do not enjoy analysing a lot of data, working with numbers, backtesting - trading is not for you. Analize the sources of your motivation when trading. Do you get mainly motivated if you see your account growing? Is the thought of getting money the main drive? Do you actually enjoy analizing graphs or just the money that will hopefully come after you do so? Many people look into Forex for a quick fix, dream job on your laptop when you're chilling on a beach somewhere. I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but it won't happen. If you don't enjoy the process of perfecting strategies, analizing tons of data, statistical analysis, you will probably never make it.
Having reread my own writing it seems like greed explains all 3 of the points I highlighted. I hope this can help some of you, the ones with the decent mindset that need that extra push and the delusional ones that will not make it and hopefully wake up sooner than later. If you are posting pictures of your profits and getting your serotonin release once you see a profitable trade - you are digging your own grave (and there's so many of you here on this subreddit). Anyways my final advice is: if you still think you have the passion, but yet find yourself struggling with psychology - just head to algorithmic trading. I have acknowledged that my psychology is in my way and my personal way of dealing with it, was just removing it from the equation. Now I'm mostly focused on building a portfolio of trading robots and I'm healthier in my trading.
Centre Forex tells us that they are offering up to 40% monthly returns and are trading breakouts based on pure technical price action with major trend lines.. Their philosophy is based on controlled risks and good returns which are the core trading principles for their two managed Forex account types, Conservative and Normal. Furthermore, Centre Forex claims that they do have the capability to ... FOREX.com is a registered FCM and RFED with the CFTC and member of the National Futures Association (NFA # 0339826). Forex trading involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Full Disclosure. Spot Gold and Silver contracts are not subject to regulation under the U.S. Commodity Exchange Act. *Increasing leverage increases risk. GAIN Capital Group LLC (dba FOREX.com ... The foreign exchange (forex) market is the largest and most liquid asset market on earth, trading 24/7 around the globe. There is actually no central location for the forex market - it is a ... Learn to trade from home while at home! Online 1:1 classes are available for forex mentoring. Forex Trading Courses for all knowledge level or get forex funding to start your forex journey. Start Today. Interact in Real-Time. Office in London. TheForexCentre Ltd I have been a Centre forex customer of a a six figure account for over 5 years. Never had a problem with execution, withdrawal, whatever. I would Highly recommend them. Share Helpful. Review moderation team note . 5 Star Rating removed. This review came from the same location in India used by CentreForex's representative. Per FPA policy, the rating in this review has been set to Zero stars ... Centreforex is the fully regulated & most experienced Managed Forex accounts & best Forex Signal Services provider in UK & Australia with high monthly return & safe investing solutions. ‘Easy Money’: Fake Forex and Fraudulent Balkan Call Centre. Aleksandar Djordjevic and Milorad Ivanovic. Belgrade. BIRN. October 19, 2020 13:00. Aleksandar Djordjevic and Milorad Ivanovic ... FOREX Branches Centres. Corporate. Back; Savings Deposit. Back; Saving Account; Royal Saving account; Purple Saving Account; Supreme Payroll Scheme. Current Deposit. Back; Current Account ; Diamond Current Account; Document required Current Account. Term Deposit. Back; Mahasanchay Deposit Plan; Recurring Deposit; Maha Millionaire / Maha Lakhpati RD; Monthly Interest Deposit Scheme; Quarterly ... Forex is a portmanteau of foreign currency and exchange. Foreign exchange is the process of changing one currency into another currency for a variety of reasons, usually for commerce, trading, or ... Überprüfen Sie, ob forex-center.info ein Betrug Website oder eine sichere Website ist. Ermitteln Sie, ob forex-center.info ist ein Betrug, betrügerische oder infiziert mit Malware, Phishing, Betrug und Spam, wenn Sie Aktivität haben
Simulator backtests LOGIC FOREX CENTER EA. This default set, you can choose SET safety,SCALPING and SNIPPER. http://forex-center.net UPDATED. Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube. Forex Analysis Software integrated with brokers like Metatrader and Oanda. Charts, performance analysis, trading diary, statistics, ratios, account management. Everything you need to manage your ... Forex. Forex. Skip navigation Sign in. Search. Loading... Close. This video is unavailable. Watch Queue Queue. Watch Queue Queue. Remove all; Disconnect; The next video is starting stop. Loading ... Forex trading can be especially tough and hard for beginners, Ziggy Digitz Shows you the best Forex trading dashboard utility for beginners & professional traders to use . Build your confidence ... Trading with F-C SYSTEM. Manual. .BREAK BIG candle moore http://forex-center.net Best Forex Trading Center is a place for aspiring and struggling traders to learn what it really takes to trade. You will also find information on proprietary trading and the possibility to manage ...